Our reply is under this lawyer’s letter sent via website contact form.
— — —
First and Last Name:
Edward Feldman, Miller Shakman Levine & Feldman LLP
Email Address:
***@millershakman.com
Referenced Link:
https://millershakman.sharefile.com/public/share/***
Message:
Dear [“Jane Doe”]: My firm represents Matthew Steven (“Matthew”) with respect to the various statements you have made about him online, on platforms including X, YouTube, Medium, Reddit, Blogspot, and others, as well as statements you have apparently made regarding him to various law enforcement agencies. I write to respond to these statements and to offer an opportunity to attend a mediated discussion with Matthew to clear up misunderstandings. [This is the second time I have reached out to you via the contact form on this website; the first was on Monday, April 21. I have also attempted to contact you via blogspot.com, but received error messages when submitting a message via the contact form there.] Based on my firm’s review of your online statements, you have alleged that Matthew, starting in 2021, began engaging in a campaign of targeted harassment, directed at you, which you say he conducted through a network of associates using anonymous online accounts. You allege that those accounts have made derogatory and untrue comments about you and to you, causing you significant distress, which has, among other things, exacerbated your mental conditions, forced you to flee your home, and caused you significant amounts of damages. You also have alleged that the murder of a family member was somehow connected to this online harassment. To be clear, Matthew categorically denies making any of the statements or doing any of the things you have accused him of. He has had no involvement in or knowledge of the alleged harassment and negative experiences you have described. Since you and he last exchanged a direct message in or around 2022, he has not communicated with you, or about you, directly, indirectly, or through any other person, in any medium, via any accounts, anonymous or otherwise, other than, from time to time, asking social media platforms to address false and hurtful statements in your postings regarding him (including those that share his personal information). To be clear, Matthew likewise has not directed any associates (including any friends, contacts, acquaintances, family members, colleagues, or otherwise) to have any such contact with you or about you, nor is he even aware of any persons who have engaged in such communication with you or about you, other than the above-mentioned occasional requests to social media platforms to address false and hurtful statements in your postings regarding him. If you have indeed experienced such anonymous harassment and distress, for which he has no responsibility, Matthew would like to express his sympathy for what sounds like an extremely challenging time. Given Matthew’s lack of involvement (either personally or via any associates) in any of the statements or actions you have attributed to him, your repeated and unfounded public accusations against him, some of which have listed his personal information, have caused him significant harm and will continue to do so if you do not stop making them. Without waiving his right to pursue legal action against you in connection with your false statements or otherwise, he would like to first offer an opportunity for the two of you to have a conversation, facilitated by a neutral third-party mediator, and represented by counsel. Please let me know via email at ***@millershakman.com, with copy to ***@millershakman.com, by April 30, 2025, if you would be open to a mediated discussion. If you have a lawyer, please forward this letter to that lawyer and ask them to contact us by that date. [A copy of this letter is also available in PDF format at the link below.] Sincerely, /s/ Edward W. Feldman Edward W. Feldman
— — —
Yes, Matthew Steven does indeed know what these victim impact statements for public safety are about, as we discussed it before his “friend”—who is allegedly part of the same ‘network’ Matthew himself mentioned in the text exchange (of which there are hundreds of pages) below—contacted me via DM on a different platform shortly after Matthew broke off the non-relationship (we have substantial reason to believe this was a
sextortion scheme).
After he lied about
cyberstalking me on nearly every public social media I was on, as well as my multiple award-winning business, and gathering my private information—which was later used for years of
sexual exploitation—his “friend” reached out regarding the false “cheating” claims Matthew made (
defamation per se), which he knew, without a doubt, were not true and were completely resistant to correction. He was insistent this was the narrative he would stick to for many years.
These lies were tied to my tenured gaming account/reputation, business/professional reputation, and my family/friend reputation.
The “friend” who contacted me demanded that I
falsely confess to my loved ones that I cheated—even when I didn't—or else they would do it for me (
blackmail). They followed through multiple times across various accounts created to perpetuate this abuse and incite others to join in the terrorizing, which hundreds of strangers did. This involves numerous federal crimes in the United States and crimes in Canada, where Matthew is from and was at that time, based directly on falsehoods he created and sexually benefited from by using them against me.
To reiterate:
I have never been this man’s girlfriend, and I was never welcomed into his life as any sort of love interest, even though his
loverboy-style grooming of me is how he gained my intimate data that was later used for targeted sextortion and blackmail, as well as public defamation and incitement of proxy abuse (also known as
stochastic terrorism). These false accusations originated from his lies and continued to be disseminated by Matthew himself and his network for many years.
I was
sexually exploited—this distinction is important. This relationship was reignited repeatedly via extreme amounts of intimidation with targeted online and offline abuse and these same defamatory false accusations when I did not capitulate to the
behavioral modification techniques he was employing without my consent, proper training, or any certifications or degrees that would make these techniques safe for someone on the autism spectrum.
This same lie of cheating was also publicly posted (sextortion) to incite targeted stochastic terrorism during
Gamergate, which started in 2014 and continued for many years, where women in gaming were actively targeted and hunted for sport while the perpetrators abused public record systems to locate their targets to their home addresses, businesses, etc.
Thousands of those users came after me and my family using the false accusations of cheating that Matthew fabricated—causing us to flee our homes for safety away from the public
doxing-for-profit content that these companies sell—a business model we cannot opt out of even when we become victims of said abuse and cyberstalking.
Matthew himself directly benefited sexually from my compliance to him in fear and terror of people coming after us—based directly on his lies and the false relationship with him—and never once attempted to resolve these “misunderstandings” in the nearly decade since he first created them. However, he now wants to address them now that he’s personally affected by people he knows finding out how he and his “friends” abuse women online outside of his fake professional persona?
He was informed of what they were doing countless times and ignored me, which led me to non-consentually capitulate to being his sexual ‘slave,’ far beyond what I originally consented to when he first started the loverboy method grooming process, because I was too afraid of further destruction and getting killed.
Whether the violent murder of my family member—who was just a baby—only five days after yet another threatening DM from the network of his “friend” in 2021—following yet another months-long harassment campaign about Matthew, full of edited evidence against me, while he ignored similar pleas—is directly connected is for law enforcement and the courts to sort through. I am not the law. I am not an investigator. I am the victim.
Matthew is free to initiate this process; we’ve done enough research and reporting, and we look forward to bringing the thousands of pieces of evidence we have to the federal court for him to address then.
